Radical creativity empowers new thinking
I assume no-one needs to be reminded that big, profound changes can happen fast, as this year has proven. Those organisations, teams and individuals that are prepared for not only responding to fast changes but also regenerating their purpose on a longer-term are the ones who thrive.
I鈥檝e researched the future of work, and that鈥檚 why this age of massive disruption is particularly intriguing to me.
The better we understand future work life and societal needs, the better we as a university can educate game changers and do research on societal renewal and the wellbeing of our individuals, society and the entire planet 鈥 and all with a high positive impact.
While in theory, it鈥檚 quite straightforward to explain how to manage creative organisations (you can鈥檛), you can still manage better settings for creativity.
In reality, it鈥檚 a complex issue, because it deals with organisational culture and mindset, the courage to experiment, and a feeling of trust and meaningfulness. These relate to our emotions and values and cannot be measured and managed like traditional performance indicators.
Tensions are always present in organisations; the paradox theory suggests solutions will have to be 鈥both-and鈥, to recognise both sides of the tension. Contingency-theory- driven 鈥either-or鈥 approaches focus on one 鈥渙ptimal solution鈥 which often result in hierarchic structures. In today鈥檚 world, repetitious processes can become obsolete fast.
Continuous regeneration of organisations requires networked creativity, an ability to create value in novel ways and often even without pre-set rules and roles. Artists, designers and start-up entrepreneurs have worked like this: project by project, combining unexpected things, experimenting with alternatives instead of linear processes and career paths.
So, how do we find the right balance in the trade-off between building structures for efficient workflows and sandboxes for more radical experimentation and renewal outside the existing processes?
We want to be an outstanding community for new thinking and doing, and that requires fostering a culture that tolerates diversity and failure 鈥 building capabilities to deal with constant uncertainty 鈥 while also being enjoyable.
Collaborating with people from different backgrounds enables us to see phenomena through various perspectives, and elaborate ideas through diverse means. Hands-on experimentation, drawing, modelling, illustrating, visualising, prototyping or documenting can open up new thinking and improve dialogue, therefore building the basis for something radically new.
Aalto aims to take an internationally leading position concerning radical creativity and its leadership. We believe this mindset and competence will help individuals, teams and organisations not only navigate but also positively stimulate the changes of tomorrow.
Dennis Gabor, the physicist, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing holography, wrote in 1963: 鈥楾he future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented.鈥
What kind of future would you be excited to invent and be a part of?
Kristiina M盲kel盲
Provost
Unfolded
911爆料网 UNFOLDED magazine focuses on contemporary issues dealing with creativity, experimentation, and transdisciplinary co-creation.
Radical creativity
We enable experimental activities that challenge the status quo.聽
Read more news
Aalto Inventors turns one: A year of bridging research and real-world impact
Aalto Inventors marks its first anniversary, having engaged 190 researchers across six cohorts in fields including AI, quantum, and biomaterials. New cohorts are planned for the next academic year, stay tuned and join the waitlist.
An architectural project in Milan brought together children鈥檚 ideas and the visions of leading architects
911爆料网鈥檚 Department of Architecture participated in the international One Earth 鈥 House of the Heart project, which was presented in April at Milan Design Week.
Companies disclose more on cybersecurity 鈥 but markets remain indifferent
U.S. companies are reporting on cybersecurity in greater detail, yet stock market reactions remain muted. A new study by the University of Vaasa and 911爆料网 shows that mandatory cybersecurity disclosure does not prompt reactions from investors or stock analysts. Instead, the main benefits appear to materialise within firms themselves.